Recovery was a complicated documentary to produce, given how the pre-production and production was fraught with new developments or changing approaches. However, this is not to say that no thought or research was put into it, despite its nature as a constantly evolving piece.
The main documentary that we researched to model our own documentary off of was Exit Through The Gift Shop, which is about the journey of Thierry Guetta, as he immerses himself within the culture of street art, and later in the documentary, the focus shifts to being about infamous street artist Banksy, who also directed this documentary. Initially, we simply admired the way the documentary was conducted, in its mesh of direct and indirect interviews, as well as its sparse use of voiceover when needed to progress their narrative. However, when taking into account the later complications surrounding Recovery, we realized that Exit Through the Gift Shop had more in common with our theoretical documentary than we thought, since Recovery also has a focus shift: from trinkets to Wade’s SD card’s recovery.We tried our best to emulate the style of Banksy’s documentary within our own- adopting the indirect interview style we had seen exhibited in his piece. Similarly, we also made an attempt to also have that transition between the topics of trinkets to Wade’s SD card as well as it was done with Guetta’s story to Banksy’s in Exit Through The Gift Shop. However, given the time constraints that we had for our documentary, we weren’t able to execute a very smooth transition between the two subjects- a flaw glaringly apparent in our documentary. If I had the chance to remake or improve Recovery, it’s this aspect that I’d want to fix more than anything else, perhaps with the inclusion of the other two interviews we had initially taken for the original Trinket documentary.
It’s a little tricky to label artists or photographers as a “social group” in the context of our documentary. However, I feel that Wade as a representative for young filmmakers and artists is paramount to the impact of this documentary. It is important to make the distinction of Wade being an artist rather than an average student because it is this relationship between him and his SD card that creates meaning in Recovery. To an average person, losing a SD card would be an inconvenience, but it would not have nearly the same impact as it would have on an artist, or specifically in this case, a budding cinematographer and director.
To Wade, more than just his memories of the family trip were lost. To him, it was his potential to make a piece of art that was lost, and it is this same feeling of loss that I tried to convey within the documentary. Simply put, Recovery represents artists as dependent on their art, and more emotionally invested in their art (or potential in this case) than in anything else.
Recovery wholly relies on the hope that the audience is emotionally invested in Wade’s story of loss and recovery. Due to the focus on art and potential that the documentary has, its meant to appeal to young artists and creators like Wade, who may be able to relate to similar stories of losing their work. Therefore, it is essential that Recovery gets the audience to associate with his story, and having them follow the ups and downs of his story as closely as they would their own, since his journey of loss and recovery is something all artists can relate to. It is meant to elicit a strong emotional response from its “slice of life” approach to the story, and leave artists connected to the film.
In general, I’m very happy with how Recovery turned out. Its narrative was compelling, its decently visually interesting, and it accomplished its goal of triggering an emotional reaction to Wade’s story. There are a few nitpicks I’d like to change in the future (namely the amateur camera movements and the often redundant voiceover), but really it's biggest flaw was the lack of context with the Trinket aspect of the documentary when compared to the SD card story. With more time and the inclusion of a few more interviews, I think this issue could be easily fixed, leaving the final product in need of only minor polishing before being considered a product I think is perfect.
For my future projects in this class, I’m definitely taking into consideration the lessons I learned from my experience making this documentary, especially the fact that just because the documentary doesn’t go as planned, doesn’t necessarily means its something to panic about. I’m generally pretty rigid and strict with my planning (just ask my group members, I plan things to such an extent it could almost be a flaw), but the production of Recovery helped me come to terms that I can just go with the flow and enjoy the natural progression of stories and projects as they come, a sentiment I hope will become apparent in any future postings to this blog!